GitHub

References

  • Alvis, D. (1987). The left cells of the Coxeter group of type $H_4$. J. Algebra 107, 160–168.
  • Alvis, D. and Lusztig, G. (1982). The representations and generic degrees of the Hecke algebra of type $H_4$. J. reine angew. Math. 336, 201–212. Erratum: ibid. vol. 449, 217–218 (1994).
  • Bala, P. and Carter, R. W. (1976). Classes of unipotent elements in simple algebraic groups. II. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 80, 1–17.
  • Benard, M. (1976). Schur indices and splitting fields of the unitary reflection groups. J. Algebra 38, 318–342.
  • Bessis, D.; Digne, F. and Michel, J. (2002). Springer theory in braid groups and the Birman-Ko-Lee monoid. Pacific J. Math. 205, 287–309.
  • Bessis, D. and Michel, J. (2004). Explicit presentations for exceptional braid groups. Experimental mathematics 13, 257–266.
  • Bonnafé, C. (2005). Quasi-Isolated Elements in Reductive Groups 1. Communications in Algebra 33, 2315–2337.
  • Boura, C.; Chavli, E. and Chlouveraki, M. (2020). The BMM symmetrising trace conjecture for the exceptional 2-reflection groups of rank 2. J. Algebra 558, 176–198.
  • Boura, C.; Chavli, E.; Chlouveraki, M. and Karvounis, K. (2020). The BMM symmetrising trace conjecture for groups $G_4$, $G_5$, $G_6$, $G_7$, $G_8$. J. Symbolic Comput. 96, 62–84.
  • Bourbaki, N. (1968). Éléments de mathématique. Fasc. XXXIV. Groupes et algèbres de Lie. Chapitre IV: Groupes de Coxeter et systèmes de Tits. Chapitre V: Groupes engendrés par des réflexions. Chapitre VI: systèmes de racines. Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles [Current Scientific and Industrial Topics], No. 1337 (Hermann, Paris); p. 288 pp. (loose errata).
  • Brieskorn, E. and Saito, K. (1972). Artin-Gruppen und Coxeter-Gruppen. Invent. Math. 17, 245–271.
  • Broué, M. and Malle, G. (1993). Zyklotomische Heckealgebren. Astérisque 212, 119–189.
  • Broué, M.; Malle, G. and Michel, J. (1993). Generic blocks of finite reductive groups. Astérisque, 7–92. Représentations unipotentes génériques et blocs des groupes réductifs finis.
  • Broué, M.; Malle, G. and Michel, J. (1999). Towards Spetses I. Transformation Groups 4, 157–218.
  • Broué, M.; Malle, G. and Michel, J. (2014). Split spetses for primitive reflection groups. Astérisque, vi+146. With an erratum to [bmm99].
  • Broué, M.; Malle, G. and Rouquier, R. (1998). Complex reflection groups, braid groups, Hecke algebras. J. reine angew. Math. 500, 127–190.
  • Broué, M. and Michel, J. (1997). Sur certains éléments réguliers des groupes de Weyl et les variétés de Deligne-Lusztig associées. In: Finite reductive groups (Luminy, 1994), Vol. 141 of Progr. Math. (Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA); pp. 73–139.
  • Carter, R. W. (1972). Conjugacy classes in the Weyl group. Compositio Math. 25, 1–59.
  • Carter, R. W. (1972). Simple groups of Lie type (Wiley, New York).
  • Carter, R. W. (1985). Finite groups of Lie type: Conjugacy classes and complex characters (Wiley, New York).
  • Chavli, E. (2018). The BMR freeness conjecture for the tetrahedral and octahedral families. Comm. Algebra 46, 386–464.
  • Chlouveraki, M. (2009). Blocks and families for cyclotomic Hecke algebras. Vol. 1981 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin); p. xiv+160.
  • Curtis, C. W. and Reiner, I. (1987). Methods of representation theory. Vol. II. Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York); p. xviii+951. With applications to finite groups and orders.
  • Dehornoy, P. and Paris, L. (1999). Gaussian groups and Garside groups, two generalizations of Artin groups. Proc. LMS 79, 569–604.
  • Deligne, P. (1972). Les immeubles des groupes de tresses généralisés. Invent. Math. 17, 273–302.
  • Deodhar, V. (1989). A note on subgroups generated by reflections in Coxeter groups. Arch. der math. 53, 543–546.
  • Digne, F. and Michel, J. (2018). Quasi-semisimple elements. Proc. LMS 116, 1301–1328.
  • Digne, F. and Michel, J. (1985). Fonctions $\mathcal L$ des variétés de Deligne-Lusztig et descente de Shintani. Bulletin de la S.M.F. mémoires 20.
  • Dyer, M. (1990). Reflection subgroups of Coxeter systems. J. Algebra 135, 57–73.
  • Frame, J. S. (1951). The classes and representations of the groups of $27$ lines and $28$ bitangents. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 32, 83–119.
  • Frame, J. S. (1970). The characters of the Weyl group $E_8$. In: Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra (Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1967) (Pergamon, Oxford-New York-Toronto, Ont.); pp. 111–130.
  • Franco, N. and González-Meneses, J. (2003). Computation of centralizers in braid groups and Garside groups. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Algebraic Geometry and Singularities (Spanish) (Sevilla, 2001), Vol. 19 no. 2; pp. 367–384.
  • Garside, F. A. (1969). The braid groups and other groups. Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 2$^{nd}$ Ser 20, 235–254.
  • Gebhardt, V. and González-Meneses, J. (2010). Solving the conjugacy problem in Garside groups by cyclic sliding. J. Symbolic Comput. 45, 629–656.
  • Geck, M. and Michel, J. (1997). On ``good'' elements in the conjugacy classes of finite Coxeter groups and their eigenvalues on the irreducible representations of Iwahori-Hecke algebras. Proc. London Math. Soc. 74, 275–305.
  • Geck, M. and Pfeiffer, G. (1993). On the irreducible characters of Hecke algebras. Advances in Math. 102, 79–94.
  • Geck, M. and Halls, A. (2015). On the Kazhdan-Lusztig cells in type $E_8$. Math. Comp. 84, 3029–3049.
  • Geck, M. and Pfeiffer, G. (2000). Characters of finite Coxeter groups and Iwahori-Hecke algebras. Vol. 21 of London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series (The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York); p. xvi+446.
  • Gordon, I. G. and Griffeth, S. (2012). Catalan numbers for complex reflection groups. American Journal of Mathematics 134, 1491–1502.
  • He, X. and Nie, S. (2012). Minimal length elements of finite Coxeter groups. Duke Math. J. 161, 2945–2967.
  • Hugues (1985). On decompositions in complex imprimitive reflection groups. Indagationes 88, 207–219.
  • Humphreys, J. E. (1990). Reflections groups and Coxeter groups. Vol. 29 of Cambridge studies in advanced Math (Camb. Univ. Press).
  • Kazhdan, D. A. and Lusztig, G. (1979). Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras. Invent. Math. 53, 165–184.
  • Kondo, T. (1965). The characters of the Weyl group of type $F_4$. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 11, 145–153.
  • Lehrer, G. I. and Springer, T. (1999). Reflection multiplicities and reflection subquotients of unitary reflection groups, I. In: geometric group theory down under; pp. 181–193.
  • Lusztig, G. (1976). Coxeter orbits and eigenspaces of Frobenius. Invent. Math. 34, 101–159.
  • Lusztig, G. (1977). Irreducible representations of finite classical groups. Invent. Math. 43, 125–175.
  • Lusztig, G. (1983). Left cells in Weyl groups. In: Lie groups representations, Vol. 1024 (Springer); pp. 99–111.
  • Lusztig, G. (1985). Characters of reductive groups over a finite field. Vol. 107 of Annals of Math. Studies (Princeton University Press).
  • Lusztig, G. (2004). Character sheaves on disconnected groups, II. Representation theory 8, 72–124.
  • Lusztig, G. and Spaltenstein, N. (1985). On the generalized Springer correspondence for classical groups. In: Adv. Stud. Pure Math., Vol. 6; pp. 289–316.
  • Lusztig, G. (1978). Representations of finite Chevalley groups. Vol. 39 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI); p. v+48. Expository lectures from the CBMS Regional Conference held at Madison, Wis., August 8–12, 1977.
  • Macdonald, I. G. (2015). Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials, paperback Edition, Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences (The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York); p. xii+475. With contribution by A. V. Zelevinsky and a foreword by Richard Stanley.
  • Malle, G. (1994). Degrés relatifs des algèbres cyclotomiques associées aux groupes de réflexions complexes de dimension deux. In: Luminy94.
  • Malle, G. (1995). Unipotente Grade imprimitiver komplexer Spiegelungsgruppen. J. Algebra 177, 768–826.
  • Malle, G. (2000). On the generic degrees of cyclotomic algebras. Representation theory 4, 342–369.
  • Malle, G. and Mathas, A. (1998). Symmetric cyclotomic Hecke algebras. J. Algebra 205, 275–293.
  • Malle, G. and Michel, J. (2010). Constructing representations of Hecke algebras for complex reflection groups. LMS J. Comput. Math. 13, 426–450.
  • Malle, G. and Rouquier, R. (2003). Familles de caractères de groupes de réflexions complexes. Representation theory 7, 610–640.
  • Malle, G. and Testerman, D. (2011). Linear algebraic groups and finite groups of Lie type. Vol. 133 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge); p. xiv+309.
  • Marin, I. and Michel, J. (2010). Automorphisms of complex reflection groups. Representation theory 14, 747–788.
  • Marin, I. and Pfeiffer, G. (2017). The BMR freeness conjecture for the 2-reflection groups. Math. Comp. 86, 2005–2023.
  • Michel, J. (2015). The development version of the CHEVIE package of GAP3. J. of Algebra 435, 308–336.
  • Mizuno, K. (1977). The conjugate classes of Chevalley groups of type $E_6$. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 24, 525–563.
  • Mizuno, K. (1980). The conjugate classes of unipotent elements of the Chevalley groups $E_7$ and $E_8$. Tokyo J. Math. 3, 391–461.
  • Murphy (1995). The representations of Hecke algebras of type A. J. Algebra 173, 97–121.
  • Paris, L. (2002). Artin monoids inject in their groups. Comment. Math. Helv. 77, 609–637.
  • Richardson, R. W. (1982). Conjugacy classes of involutions in Coxeter groups. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 26, 1–15.
  • Shephard, G. C. and Todd, J. A. (1954). Finite unitary reflection groups. Canad. J. Math. 6, 274–304.
  • Shoji, T. (1982). On the Green polynomials of a Chevalley group of type $F_4$. Comm. Algebra 10, 505–543.
  • Sokal, A. D. (2023). A simple algorithm for expanding a power series as a continued fraction. Expositiones Math. 41, 245–287.
  • Spaltenstein, N. (1982). Classes unipotentes et sous-groupes de Borel. Vol. 946 of Lecture notes in Mathematics (Springer).
  • Spaltenstein, N. (1985). On the generalized Springer correspondence for exceptional groups. In: Algebraic groups and related topics (Kyoto, Nagoya, 1983), Vol. 6 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. (North-Holland, Amsterdam); pp. 317–338.
  • Stembridge, J. R. (1989). On the eigenvalues of representations of reflection groups and wreath products. Pacific J. Math. 140, 353–396.
  • Tsuchioka, S. (2020). BMR freeness for icosahedral family. Exp. Math. 29, 234–245.
  • Zelevinsky, A. V. (1981). Representations of finite classical groups. Vol. 869 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York); p. iv+184. A Hopf algebra approach.
  • Zheng, H. (2006). A new approach to extracting roots in Garside groups. Comm. Algebra 34, 1793–1802.